The consequences of climate change, on the poles, is a topic
which has been discussed extensively within academic literature (Thompson and
Solomon, 2002; Oppenheimer,
1998), the news (BBC, 2015)
and NGOs (WWF).
The
IPCC even designated its 15th chapter to the topic. Due to
the nature of the Poles, impacts of global warming are amplified in these
regions. Conditions (such as the total amount of sea ice) are changing at an accelerated rate (in comparison to
global averages) resulting in rising global
temperatures, concentrations of atmospheric methane and sea levels.
Climate change is not the only threat to the Poles. Throughout
the next few months I aim to explore the impacts of anthropogenic activity on
the Polar Regions. Oil drilling and long
range pollution are both issues which have not been debated so openly. The impacts
of such threats may not be felt on such a large scale but will certainly push Polar
ecosystems past a non-returnable threshold.
For example, The USGS has estimated the Arctic is sitting
upon 10.4 billion barrels of oil. History has already shown the dangers of oil
in Arctic environments. Over 20 years
since the Exxon
Valdez 1989 disaster, when a tanker ran aground in Alaska releasing almost 11
million gallons of crude oil. Evidence for the disaster is still apparent.
Further research into this case has shown cold environments preserve oil
particles for years, in some cases still remaining biologically toxic. This
disaster has been raised recently as a reminder of the potential impacts of oil
spills (the death of a quarter of a million sea creatures in this case) especially
as drilling for natural resources (in the poles) becomes an ever pressing
threat.
A single opinion (expressed by Greenpeace)
has been stated in this post. We should protect the poles. However, this isn’t
the only view point. Should we be drilling for oil in the Arctic? Are the
greater impacts of climate change for which mitigation should be prioritised?
There is always another side to every story. A loss will always result in
another’s gain.
I will engage with (and hopefully draw conclusions on) the debates
surrounding anthropogenic threats to the poles and hopefully complete the following aims
1) To introduce other threats, beside climate change caused by green house gases, to my readers.
2) I want to present topics which may be very scientific to my readers in a way which everyone, from whatever academic background, can understand and engage with.
3) Try and encourage people that these issues do matter and they should act to save the Polar Regions.
4) To learn and teach other about something I have never personally learnt about throughout my geography studies.
Please feel free to argue, disagree or debate anything I
cover by commenting.
Great to see that you've started blogging already. A couple of quick comments: watch your spelling of Arctic (not Artic). Also, that the Arctic and Antarctic nearly always need to be treated completely differently. Finally, choose references which you cite carefully.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment! If you check out my most recent post "What's the deal with Antarctica and the Arctic?" it will give you some more information concerning the differences between the two polar regions. Happy Reading!
Deletethere was of course a more recent major oil spill in 2010 when the Deepwater Horizon rig owned by BP blew up off the gulf of Mexico
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. I plan on focusing on The Polar Regions so the Gulf of Mexico lies outside the scope of my blog. I found the oil spill (mentioned in the post above) interesting as it related to the company, Exxon Mobil, i was discussing, but particularly the fact that active oil particles are still found within this area as a result of the cold conditions conserving such substances. If this is an area which interests you this article is very informative. Take a read! http://www.arctis-search.com/Effects+of+Oil+Spills+in+Arctic+Waters
Delete