So, in my first post I touched upon the 1989 Exxon Mobil oil
spill. ExxonMobil
is the largest publicly traded international oil and gas company, yet it hasn’t
been a good week for them!
Inside
climate news (2015) published an article exposing the controversial research
occurring within the company during the 1980s. Turns out Exxon Mobil have
known about the prospects of climate change as early as 1979 (Shocker!). Research (conducted by Exxon Mobil), on impacts of potential global warming on oil prices, concluded unless
fossil fuel use was constrained, there would be noticeable changes to
atmospheric temperature. This was furthered by the prediction of 400 parts per
million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by 2010. Turns out this is
remarkably accurate as currently, ppm stands at 397.65 (c02now, 2015)
What is alarming is this information was solely circulated within
the company. Despite being described as a “great and urgent” (Kinsley,
1979) problem, this theory never went public. This spurred the investment of vast funds into researching the theory and by 1981 the trajectory of atmospheric change
has been confirmed. The treats of policy change were too great. Exxon Mobil hid
the results out of fear of the implications for the fossil fuel market, stating
the results were too murky to act. Yet if they had been published would we have
acted? Could we have limited the current extent of climate change?
This post strolls a bit from the path of polar threats, yet
Exxon Mobil is one of the largest stakeholders in the Poles, with exploration
projects in the Beaufort Sea since the 1970s (FuelFix, 2015). This acts as a reminder; when
looking at the polar debates, always be critical, always consider the possibilities ulterior
motives of stakeholders and never believe everything you read. The fact this research was not publicly published was unbelievable and gives an example of the vested interests which some stakeholders (particularly in relation to exploration) hold. Tread with care Exxon Mobil, you are walking on thin ice.
No comments:
Post a Comment