Mercury is headlining the Arctic. |
What is mg?
Mercury (Hg) is a naturally occurring element. With a very
low melting point of
-38.87 degrees Celsius, mercury is most often found as a silver liquid. Before
the industrial revolution the total amount of mercury in the environment was in
equilibrium. The anthropogenic creation of mercury has upset this balance
causing excess mercury to be found in the soils, surface water and oceans (all
of which are large global stores of the element).
Map showing Mercury released into the atmosphere tonnes per year |
The natural abundance of mercury, in the environment is
doubled, by that produced from human innovation (about 4000
tonnes). Burning coal is by far the largest production of man-made mercury,
followed by the smelting and metal production industries (as Hg is used in the
creation ferrous and non-ferrous metals). A larger proportion is generated through
the mining industry, which uses mercury to extract from gold natural ores. “Hot Spots” for release of atmospheric
mercury include China, Sudan and the North West Coast of South America, demonstrated by the
map (right).
It has been estimated that the net amount of mercury added
to the Arctic environment each year is between 80 to 140 tonnes (NB: mercury is also leaving the Arctic system). Most of the Mercury
present in the Arctic is transported by prevailing winds, ocean currents and
rivers. Atmospheric pollution, from mid latitude power stations, can take as
little as a few
days to be transported from source to the Arctic. Transportation through
the atmosphere can have detrimental impacts as gaseous Hg can have a lifespan
of up to a few months (within this time a mercury atom has the potential to
circulate the majority of the northern hemisphere).
The oceans
are also a great transporter of Hg, yet a much slower method of distribution. However,
it is important to remember the amount of mercury reported in the atmosphere is
smaller in comparison to the volume stored in the oceans.
Mercury budget in
the Arctic Ocean.
The Mercury
budget, for the Arctic Ocean, suggests the Atlantic and Pacific oceans,
coastal erosion and the atmospheric (through mercury depletion
events during spring) are all large inputs of mercury to the Arctic system.
The proportion of mercury sourced from atmospheric deposition demonstrates the
large surface area of the Arctic Ocean. The
outflows of mercury are less apparent including sedimentation, the removal
through ocean systems and to a very small extent the remission of gases. The disproportionate
ratio of inflows to outflows demonstrate why the Arctic is a site of mercury accumulation.
Modelling the Arctic mercury budget must be completed on a
global scale to incorporate the influence of long range transport. A large
scale results in a greater level of uncertainty associated with the models as
resolution of results are low. This can be overcome by using a multi-scale
approach (using models which integrate global and regional scales) which is
adopted within a study published in the Atmospheric
Environment Journal. Within the paper Dastoor and Larocque use a global/regional
atmospheric heavy metals model to simulate the movement of mercury within the
atmosphere, allowing a higher resolution to be obtained.
Stay tuned for my next post which will delve deeper into the
impacts of mercury on ecosystems in the Arctic. Until then please comment any
questions or thoughts you have in response to this post.
P.S. For those of you who found the topic of mercury
particularly thrilling this website http://www.mercurywatch.org/
is well worth a read. The site monitors the use of mercury across the world in
small scale gold mines. Sponsors aid projects which aim to reduce mercury
production by training workers to use mercury free extraction methods in Ghana,
Senegal and Burkina Faso. Benefiting both the environment and the health of
works.
This is a great summary of Mercury. I honestly had no idea it was a chemical in equilibrium before... or actually anything about the metal other than its use in thermometers. I would really be interested in finding out the impacts!
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed it! oh Louis you are jumping the gun! Hold tight till next weeks post in which I will tell you all about the impacts of mercury, in particular bio accumulation in food chains.
DeleteI cannot wait Charlie! Thanks!
DeleteReally interesting post! I've definitely thought about mercury pollution but mostly as a toxic substance in fish (which is quite big in Asia) and not in the Arctic. Do you think a move to complete renewable energy is enough to move mercury back into equilibrium in the Arctic?
ReplyDeleteThanks! Glad you enjoyed it! I found mercury a really interesting topic to blog about! Wow this is a tricky question and honestly I don't know! Firstly I think a move to only renewables is a long way off so i am not sure if it would be a realistic mitigation method (but that is just my opinion). In relation to reducing mercury in the Arctic i found this paper http://aem.asm.org/content/73/7/2230.full which states mercury concentrations are lower in areas which contain a certain microbe. There seems to be some potential for using this microbe to remove mercury from the Arctic environment!
ReplyDelete